Marty,

Are you suggesting the whole idea of removing needs testing from small IPv4 transfers would be a massive abuse vector? Or;

Do you mean only John's suggestion of a presumption of good faith for small allocations would be a massive abuse vector?

Thanks.

On 4/30/14, 17:19 , Martin Hannigan wrote:
It'll be a massive abuse vector.

Best,

Martin

On Wednesday, April 30, 2014, John Santos <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


    I agree with Bill.  It might be appropriate to drop needs testing for
    small allocations simply because it is not worth the effort, but I don't
    see a /16 as being small.  Something in the range of /24 to /20 would
    be better.

    Another idea to ponder would be instead of dropping the need
    requirement,
    we adopt a presumption of good faith for small allocations.  ARIN would
    simply take the word of the requester or recipient for small allocations
    or transfers, but if it was later discovered the recipient was acting in
    bad faith, the allocation could be revoked.

    On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, William Herrin wrote:

     > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 1:35 AM, John Springer
    <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote:
     > > ARIN-prop-204 Removing Needs Test from Small IPv4 Transfers
     > >
     > > Policy statement:
     > > Change the language in NRPM 8.3 after Conditions on the
    recipient of the
     > > transfer: from "The recipient must demonstrate the need for up
    to a 24-month
     > > supply of IP address resources under current ARIN policies and
    sign an RSA."
     > > to "For transfers larger than a /16 equivalent, the recipient must
     > > demonstrate the need for up to a 24-month supply of IP address
    resources
     > > under current ARIN policies and sign an RSA."
     >
     > How would we go about assessing whether such changes prove harmful or
     > helpful? What metrics does ARIN collect under this policy which
    can be
     > analyzed and presented here so we can consider expanding it to larger
     > transfers? Does no justification mean no documentation?
     >
     > What makes you think /16 is the right place to start testing this
     > idea? Traditionally /24 was the last no-justification request
     > accepted. Why is that not the right place to start testing a new
     > no-justification regime?
     >
     > For now I OPPOSE the proposal as written but I'd like to hear more.
     >
     > Regards,
     > Bill Herrin
     >
     >
     > --
     > William D. Herrin ................ [email protected]
    <javascript:;> [email protected] <javascript:;>
     > 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
     > Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
     > _______________________________________________
     > PPML
     > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
     > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]
    <javascript:;>).
     > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
     > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
     > Please contact [email protected] <javascript:;> if you experience any
    issues.
     >
     >

    --
    John Santos
    Evans Griffiths & Hart, Inc.
    781-861-0670 ext 539

    _______________________________________________
    PPML
    You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
    the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected] <javascript:;>).
    Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
    http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
    Please contact [email protected] <javascript:;> if you experience any
    issues.



_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.



--
================================================
David Farmer               Email: [email protected]
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE     Phone: 1-612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029  Cell: 1-612-812-9952
================================================
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to