Sandra, The goal isn't to extend the free pool. There is no goal. We'll exhaust based on current policy. This is bad policy that benefits few.
PLease elaborate on your questions about recent assignments. Happy to educate you. Best, -M< On Wednesday, April 30, 2014, <[email protected]> wrote: > Martin: > > I think making transfers of already allocated IP's easier, makes the > free pool last longer. This decelerates, not accelerates, exhaustion. > The impact will probably be slight because the buyers, the transferors, > are the medium to little guys, not David's 11 who are getting the vast > majority of the IP's. > > Of course, making the free pool last longer could allow companies who > know how to work the current ARIN policy system, get even more blocks > over the next few months. You don't know of any large companies that > got a /10 from the free pool lately, do you? > > (Smiley) > > Best, > Sandra > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-204 Removing Needs Test from Small > IPv4 > From: Martin Hannigan <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > Date: Wed, April 30, 2014 7:35 pm > To: "<[email protected] <javascript:;>>" > <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > Cc: "[email protected] <javascript:;>" <[email protected] <javascript:;> > > > > > > Of course you would say that. (Smiley). > > > You think it accelerates exhaustion. Trust me, it needs no help. Sit > back and let real stakeholders define our own destiny please. > > > Best, > > > -M< > > > > > > On Apr 30, 2014, at 19:20, <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > > > > > <sigimg0> > > > > > Message: 4 > Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 18:44:04 -0400 > From: Martin Hannigan <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > To: John Springer <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > Cc: "[email protected] <javascript:;>" <[email protected]<javascript:;> > > > Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-204 Removing Needs Test from Small > IPv4 Transfers (fwd) > Message-ID: > > <camdxq5pqs-oqj8ypq+rxsevti-knqv5w5xqckguw8y+_9k_...@mail.gmail.com<javascript:;> > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Not in favor. Post exhaustion perhaps. > > > > To negate Mr. Hannigan's point, > > > 1) it will not be an abuse vector, as it is only for transfers, not for > requests from the ARIN free pool. > > > 2) There is no need to wait for exhaustion, as transfers are the same > pre as post exhaustion. > > > If anything removal of needs justification prior to exhaustion will > cause the ARIN free pool to last longer. > > > Sandra Brown > IPv4 Market Group > > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected] <javascript:;>). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] <javascript:;> if you experience any issues. >
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
