> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Jeffrey Lyon > Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 7:49 AM > > Friends, Colleagues, > > A couple of years ago I brought up an issue I had run into where the > utilization requirement for new requests is being calculated on a per > allocation basis rather than in aggregate. For example, if an organization > has 4 x /22 and 3 of them are utilized 100% and the fourth utilized at > 75%, that request would be denied. This is a bit out of balance as an > organization with a single /20 utilized at 80% would have less efficient > utilization but would be eligible to request additional space. > > The last time this was discussed it sounded as if the community would > support a policy proposal to change this calculation to be considered in > aggregate vs. per assignment. Does this remain the case?
In the current policy legacy assignments are implicitly excluded from this calculation. Would they be excluded or included in your aggregate suggestion? In the case of large or multinational organizations, how far would you aggregate? e.g. All Microsoft divisions, spanning RIRs; Comcast all markets? Richard Letts _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
