On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Steven Ryerse <[email protected]> wrote: > Milton's conclusion in the research for his article: > > http://www.internetgovernance.org/2014/06/20/baby-steps-and-big-differences-in-address-transfer-market/ > > indicates that the significant majority of the transfers as a result of the > removal of needs testing in Policy of other RIRs is in the smallest block > sizes in the /19-/22 range.
I'd rather look at data than conclusions: "Just eleven (11) transfers have occurred within the ARIN region. Fifteen additional transfers, including a /13 (524,288 addresses), have been inter-regional from ARIN to APNIC." So where is the flood of transfer requests mentioned in the Problem Statement? I don't see it. If RS says it is a problem, I'd be happy to believe them, but I've never known them to complain about workload before. -- Cheers, McTim "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
