To follow up on this, here are the relevant portions of the ARIN Staff Assessment that was just posted to PPML along with the revised version of the policy:
A. ARIN Staff Comments > The impact of inter-RIR transfers of ASNs on ARIN from both an > operational and development perspective are nominal today, but pose an > unknown (but at least moderate) impact over the medium-term due to > potentially significant impacts for additional requirements and/or > specifications necessary for RPKI support of inter-RIR ASN transfers. > > 3. Resource Impact > This policy would have minimal to moderate resource impact from an > implementation aspect. It is estimated that implementation would occur > within 3 - 9 months after ratification by the ARINBoard of Trustees. The > following would be needed in order to implement: > Future impact from RPKI implementation could involve either some kind of > RIR<->IANA<->RIR coordination system or ERX for ASNs > Updated guidelines and internal procedures > Staff training -Scott On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Mike Burns <[email protected]> wrote: > I support further discussion of the RPKI issue. > I don't think it will be difficult to overcome the issues raised by Mr. > Huston, but since demand for Inter-RIR ASN transfers is low, there is > little harm in waiting to get it right. > I know there were some procedural wrinkles involved in early Inter-RIR > address transfers and we may be able to anticipate and work around these > kinds of things through further discussion. > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Scott Leibrand <[email protected]> > *To:* Michael Peddemors <[email protected]> > *Cc:* ARIN-PPML List <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 23, 2014 1:54 PM > *Subject:* Re: [arin-ppml] Advisory Council Meeting Results - July 2014 > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Scott Leibrand <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Michael Peddemors < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> The AC is continuing to work on the following: >> >> >>> Draft Policy ARIN-2014-15: Allow Inter-RIR ASN Transfers >>>> >>> >>> +1, all logical, can't really see how that can be abused. >>> >> >> The main concern now is the impact of Inter-RIR ASN Transfers on the RPKI >> system. Geoff brought up the issue at the NANOG PPC in Bellevue, >> > > To respond to a private query, Geoff's comments can be reviewed at > https://www.arin.net/participate/meetings/reports/ppc_nanog61/ppc_transcript.html#anchor_14 > > -Scott > > >> and the subsequent staff assessment highlighted the fact that ARIN >> would need to do additional RPKI development to make Inter-RIR ASN >> transfers work with RPKI. Therefore, most of the AC felt (and convinced me) >> that we shouldn't recommend ARIN-2014-15 for adoption after Baltimore, but >> rather should leave it as a Draft Policy and discuss the RPKI issues there. >> >> -Scott >> >> > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. > >
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
