John, You skipped the important bits.
FYI, -M< On Monday, August 18, 2014, John Curran <[email protected]> wrote: > On Aug 18, 2014, at 7:04 PM, Martin Hannigan <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > John, > > > > The policy proposal in the archive initially stated that it should be > > brought to the attention of the community and didn't imply roadblocks. > > I forget how the whois requirement was inserted and I don't really > > care since the issue is policy, ... > > Martin - > > ARIN staff implement the policy, and the requirement is quite > clear in the present policy language. I believe that there was > some concern about mining of the address blocks if it were to be > public, but again, that is a tradeoff that the community should > consider and determine policy accordingly. > > Changing the policy language to drop the bulk whois requirement > would be a relatively easy change, if there is community support; > please let me know if you need any assistance in developing an > appropriate policy proposal. > > Thanks! > /John > > John Curran > President and CEO > ARIN > >
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
