I agree of course we should allocate small blocks as well. It seems like a no
brainer that we wouldn't want to also allocate all those small /24 block
instead of letting ipv4 run out and nobody gets to use them.
Steven Ryerse
President
100 Ashford Center North, Suite 110, Atlanta, GA 30338
770.656.1460 - Cell
770.399.9099- Office
℠ Eclipse Networks, Inc.
Conquering Complex Networks℠
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Mike Burns
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 1:45 PM
To: ARIN
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-18: Simplifying
MinimumAllocations and Assignments
I support the proposal. How else are we going to get rid of the more than
1,000 /24s left as the dregs of decades of allocations?
It will take a long time to dole out one /24 every three months to each needy
applicant, do we want to extend this near-exhaust environment?
-----Original Message-----
From: Blake Dunlap
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 1:17 PM
To: ARIN
Cc: [email protected] List
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-18: Simplifying Minimum
Allocations and Assignments
Opposed, as I do not see the need to justify 200 addresses as enough of a
burden to outweigh the benefits of not giving out /24s like candy to those who
cannot when coupled with the likely to be implemented minimum /24 size
allocation to an ORG.
The laws of physics cause this to be needed, due to current technology used to
preform the basic functions of the internet. This would not be good stewardship
of the resource as this is a remarkably low barrier to entry considering the
ramifications.
-Blake
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:58 AM, ARIN <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 17 July 2014 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted "ARIN-prop-210
> Simplifying Minimum Allocations and Assignments" as a Draft Policy.
>
> Draft Policy ARIN-2014-18 is below and can be found at:
> https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2014_18.html
>
> You are encouraged to discuss the merits and your concerns of Draft
> Policy 2014-18 on the Public Policy Mailing List.
>
> The AC will evaluate the discussion in order to assess the conformance
> of this draft policy with ARIN's Principles of Internet Number
> Resource Policy as stated in the PDP. Specifically, these principles are:
>
> * Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration
> * Technically Sound
> * Supported by the Community
>
> The ARIN Policy Development Process (PDP) can be found at:
> https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html
>
> Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at:
> https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html
>
> Regards,
>
> Communications and Member Services
> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
>
>
> ## * ##
>
>
> Draft Policy ARIN-2014-18
> Simplifying Minimum Allocations and Assignments
>
> Date: 23 July 2014
>
> Problem Statement:
>
> New and small organizations are having a difficult time receiving
> resource allocations from ARIN because of the economic, administrative
> and time burdens of making their way through ARIN’s needs testing
> process. For small allocations, the burdens of needs testing may
> exceed the value of the resources, or may deter small, less
> well-funded organizations’ ability to receive an allocation from ARIN.
> As ARIN was created to provide Internet resources to ALL organizations
> within its geographic territory, this disparity in the Policy Manual
> needs to be addressed. The problem can be remedied by removing needs
> testing for any organization that applies to receive the current
> minimum block size allocation.
>
> Policy statement:
>
> Therefore I propose the following addition to the Policy Manual
> (possibly as
> 4.2.1.7):
> “A Minimum IP allocation size(s) has been defined per Section 4 of the
> ARIN Number Resource Policy Manual. Regardless of any policy
> requirement(s) defined in any other active Section of the Policy
> Manual, all organizations may apply and shall automatically qualify
> for the current Minimum IP Block Allocation upon completing the normal
> administrative application process and fee requirements, and all
> organizations shall be eligible for such an allocation once every 12
> months. Where this is in conflict with any other Section in the Policy
> Manual, this Section shall be controlling.”
>
> Comments:
> a. Timetable for implementation:
> b. Anything else:
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN
> Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public
Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public
Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
