Owen
I would not support an automatic entitlement.
There is no question that the process can seem daunting, but it is a
minimal barrier to entry in my mind.
And I apologize for not paying more attention to the discussion.
Bruce C
On 09/04/2014 01:53 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Sep 4, 2014, at 8:49 AM, Bruce Cornett <[email protected]> wrote:
For what it is worth, I think this is a good policy for the smaller guys.
I have two clients that desperately want their own allocation. One runs a WISP
with a /24 and the other high security cloud stack with a /22.
Both need to double immediately. And I hate parting with the address space.
They cannot meet the /20 criteria and giving them addresses from our space
limits our business model - because granting that won't push us to the point
where we can request more. And dual homing them doesn't do anything for my
business.
In about two weeks, they will be able to qualify at the /24 level, and the /20
criteria completely goes away based on policy which has already been adopted
and is pending implementation.
Given that, do you still see a need for this proposal?
Owen
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
