Kevin,  I pulled the Mission Statement info from ARIN’s web site and this is 
what it says:

Former Mission Statement:
Applying the principles of stewardship, ARIN, a nonprofit corporation, 
allocates Internet Protocol resources; develops consensus-based policies; and 
facilitates the advancement of the Internet through information and educational 
outreach.

Current Mission Statement:
ARIN, a nonprofit member-based organization, supports the operation of the 
Internet through the management of Internet number resources throughout its 
service region; coordinates the development of policies by the community for 
the management of Internet Protocol number resources; and advances the Internet 
through informational outreach.

Both of them reference advancement of the Internet. Your brief description 
below sounds like what you want to do would advance the Internet in some small 
way. That said, why do you automatically argue against and deny yourself the 
possibility of getting the /24 you desire – just because you don’t meet some 
arbitrary needs test that the powers that be in this community have codified 
for whatever reasons in the current policy.

I believe strongly that you and anyone else like you should have just as much 
right to get that /24 as anyone else. That is why I proposed ARIN 2014-18 which 
eliminates needs tests on a /24 once per year. Of course ARIN would still 
charge their fee on that and you would have to decide to pay each year you keep 
it.

This notion that only larger organizations should be able to justify an 
allocation is NOT what was intended when ARIN was formed and somehow this 
community and ARIN has gotten so far off track from ARINs mission, that folks 
like you have been convinced that what they would do with an allocation doesn’t 
advance the Internet - and therefore are not entitled to participate in 
advancing the Internet going forward.

Somewhere in the ARIN region today - there is someone who wants to be the next 
Steve Jobs of the Internet – but he or she can’t get their /24 because of some 
dopey policy.  How did we come from Jon Postel all the way to  this?

We can begin the process of fixing this situation by members of this community 
supporting 2014-18 and some of the other current policy proposals that attempt 
to loosen up allocations for smaller organizations.  If you want to help 
advance the Internet it is the proper thing to do.

Steven Ryerse
President
100 Ashford Center North, Suite 110, Atlanta, GA  30338
770.656.1460 - Cell
770.399.9099- Office

[Description: Description: Eclipse Networks Logo_small.png]℠ Eclipse Networks, 
Inc.
        Conquering Complex Networks℠

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Kevin Kargel
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:45 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [arin-ppml] reverse COE statement

I should point out that the strength of my convictions on the discussion of 
needs assessment impacts me negatively on a personal level.  I am in a position 
where I would love to get a /24 for my own use, personally and business.  
Unfortunately I would not pass the needs requirement.  I could present about 40 
IP addresses that are currently NATed, with some small future growth 
projection.  That would not – in my understanding – pass muster for an 
allocation under the current rules.  I will in the near future be changing 
locations and providers for that network and a portable IP block would be most 
handy.
I honestly do not believe that eliminating needs tests would be good for 
society.
If needs tests were eliminated all that would be left in my way would be the 
money hurdle, which presents a relatively low bar to vault.

Don’t get me wrong, if needs tests are eliminated over my objections I will be 
at the front of the line with my application.  I see nothing wrong with 
legitimately leveraging the system that exists.

I know it would be trivial as a network operator to game the system for a /24, 
I just don’t want to do it that way.

[Kevin_Kargel]

_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to