On Sep 18, 2014, at 16:22, Andrew Dul wrote: > On 2014-09-18 13:37, Owen DeLong wrote: > > > > I would also prefer to leave 4.10.2 at /10 rather than shrinking it to > > /11. I realize this means only the IANA returned space becomes > > available for 4.10.1. I think that is appropriate. > > > > My reasoning for splitting the /10 was to ensure that the 4.10.1 > austerity pool was large enough to serve the ARIN community. Since the > block sizes in the austerity pool are larger than the transition pool, > the austerity pool needs to be larger to serve more organizations. > > At the maximum allocation size, if this draft was to be implemented as > currently constructed, this is the total number of organizations that > could be served today. > > 8192 organizations (/24s) from a /11 under the transition pool 4.10.2 > > 5120 organizations (/22s) from 2 /11s and 1 /12 under the austerity pool > 4.10.1 > > To me this seems like the right split. This split could be adjusted in > the future but at this time we are still setting aside more transition > space for more organizations than austerity space.
You have made the assumption that the already received 10.5 allocations will be available for use as part of 4.10.1. I don't know that that will be the case by the time this policy is implemented. Andy _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
