On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Milton and All, > > I am concerned with the following: > > "ARIN reserves the right to request a listing of all the applicant's number > holdings in the region(s) of proposed use, but this should happen only when > there are significant reasons to suspect duplicate requests." > > I feel this should be changed to the following: > > "ARIN reserves the right to request a listing of all the applicant's number > holdings in the region(s) of proposed use" >
I feel it should be eliminated. As it was mentioned at the microphone in the Baltimore meeting, ARIN isn't consistent in applications of language like and appear to be widely abused. ARIN already has Section 12. Why is that not good enough? [ clip ] We seem to have completely (as usual) ignored all of the feedback from the microphone at both the PPC and the Baltimore meeting. When you scrub the comments of the AC, you end up with a fairly negative response to this proposal including two large holders of resources stating that this is a no op as well: already using numbers in other regions and even ARIN (Curran) chimed in and said that it wasn't a problem. Anyone care to address the points, from a technical perspective, that the LEO community raised as well? I really wish the AC would get out of the regulatory business and into the stewardship business. <hope> Best, -M< _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
