On 14-12-04 09:31 AM, Andrew Gallo wrote:
(cross posted from NANOG)
Greetings:
In the past few months, I've spoken with, or heard second hand, from a
number of organizations that will not or cannot sign ARIN's RPKI
Relying Agreement. Acceptance of this agreement is required in order
to gain access to ARIN's Trust Anchor Locator (TAL).
Given the size and number of these organizations that can't or wont
accept the agreement makes me wonder if this is a show stopper that
will prevent the adoption of this technology.
I've created a quick survey to get an idea of the community's take on
this agreement with the idea that if enough organizations indicate it
is unacceptable, maybe we can get this agreement changed, or as with
other regions, not explicitly required to use the TAL.
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/10RLBBpL05n1c_H4unHitlsVqNM3rZI5aXAX8iSBc_Kk/viewform?usp=send_form
You seem to have left out one question in the survey: "even if you have
signed the agreement, did you think it was ridiculous, legalistic,
overbearing and paternalistic, anyway?"
--
-Adam Thompson
[email protected]
Cell: +1 204 291-7950
Fax: +1 204 489-6515
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
