*From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
*On Behalf Of *Martin Hannigan
"Needs testing" isn't actually the problem IMHO. Its not unrealistic
to ask what someone is going to use the addresses for. Over the last
five years, policy ("the problem") has become disconnected with
existing conditions and vague allowing too much interpretation. Its
impossible to know what need actually is with the current regime.
I like the idea of not testing /24s. It solves the ambiguity problem.
It will also make them more attractive and the market more efficient
by reducing the cost of the transaction and increasing utilization of
/24s available to the market (legacy). By utilization I mean
capturing actual registrations.
To be honest, from a market pressure perspective, what is needed
_right now_ is a sixth competitive registry. That would sort this mess
out right quick.
Best,
-M<
Martin, in the scenario I outlined a few minutes ago, would the transfer
market substitute effectively for your 6th registry?
--
-Adam Thompson
[email protected]
Cell: +1 204 291-7950
Fax: +1 204 489-6515
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
