Martin
As an AC member I would be very receptive to seeing forwarded emails from OIX 
(or other trade association lists) that directly comment on specific ARIN 
policies. I would certainly give them weight in determining community support. 
A formal statement from the leadership of such an association would of course 
be more powerful, but I think that a single OIX member acting as an informal 
liaison by forwarding emails would serve a very useful function.

I understand perfectly why the majority of members of OIX or any other trade 
association would not want to join a highly specialized mailing list such as 
PPML. On the other hand, I am aware of the self-selection and narrowing process 
that can occur on these specialized lists. Therefore I think when people on the 
PPML bring to our attention relevant views from other communities it is 
extremely important and useful.

--MM


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Martin Hannigan
Sent: Friday, December 26, 2014 7:15 PM
To: John Curran
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] What is Open-IX and why does it matter? Was: Re: What 
the heck is OIX? (was RE: Draft Policy ARIN-2014-21: Modification to CI Pool 
Size per Section 4.4)



On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 6:16 PM, John Curran 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On Dec 26, 2014, at 2:29 PM, Martin Hannigan 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> ...

[ snip ]


    We've had this question arise in the past with other trade organizations,
    and have been consistent in its application, whether with regard to address
    policy for individual sectors of ARIN's region or individual technologies 
such
    as hosting and wireless.   Please feel free to share any recommendations
    from the OIX community that might be germane to address policy, but it is
    also advisable for those who wish to actually participate in the ARIN policy
    development process to do so on the PPML mailing list.

Many that are part of the OIX community have already stated their aversion to 
joining the noise heavy mailing list in order to comment once or twice a year. 
As far as trade association inter communications, do you have a written 
guidance on this supported by the Board? It would be good to clarify exactly 
how trade organizations should provide input to "ARIN" on behalf of their 
members and if that will not be valid - in writing. It would likely help to 
make the case to consider participating in other ways where there is 
[currently] aversion.
Best,
-M<




_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to