On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Owen DeLong <[email protected]> wrote: .... > I see no advantage to 2014-22. I think when this block comes into play, > since it is a particular designated block, ISPs will react relatively > quickly to allow longer prefixes within this space when it becomes > necessary.
Currently opposed to 2014-22, but can be convinced to take a pragmatic support position with some actual facts. >From a theoretical perspective, 2014-22 should not seem to be necessary. However, while ARIN has never insured number routability, the reality is many /24 filters are in place. Since this block is intended to be a lifeline, that lifeline would ideally not be attached to an anchor (of needing to convince others to update their filters). What I would like to hear is the results of even a non-scientific straw poll (perhaps at the upcoming NANOG at the PPC?) that indicates that ISPs have already updated their filters accordingly to allow a /28 out of this /10, or have plans to do so (or will choose not do so). That would be highly helpful to me to decide whether to support this proposal as one of those things that needs to be advanced (while holding ones nose). Gary _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
