On 2/24/2015 12:55 PM, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:17 PM, ARIN <[email protected]> wrote: >> ARIN-2014-14 has been revised. This draft policy is open for discussion >> on this mailing list. > .... >> Draft Policy ARIN-2014-14 >> Needs Attestation for some IPv4 Transfers > Trying to better understand the details..... > >> 2.An officer of the organization must attest that the IPv4 address >> block is needed for and will be used on an operational network. > So no time frame at all for usage in their organization? > Any time frame is OK? Any organization is OK?
I believe based upon the current text, the answers to these 3 questions is "yes." > > .... >> 4.Fewer than 5,000 needs attestation transfers have occurred. > Where did the 5000 come from? WAG? If I calculated > this correctly, that would mean somewhere between a > /12 and a /8 could fall under attestation only. It is basically a WAG. Originally on the AC list 10,000 was proposed. Why 10,000? On average over the past 5 years, ARIN has made about 2,000 allocations or assignments per year. Some members of the AC noted a smaller number was needed, and thus the next draft reduced it to 5,000. Do you support this number? If not, is there a number you would be more comfortable with? Thanks, Andrew _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
