If I understand what counsel is claiming, it is in a way a contrapositive inference. That is- because ARIN does not assign resources to applicants who do not have a presence within its region, there is no logical basis for assertion of jurisdiction beyond that region.
MM: I thought we had already disposed of the false claim that 2014-1 does not require a presence in the region. Would you are to reframe this argument in a way that is relevant to 2014-1? I just don’t understand it
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
