On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Andrew Dul <[email protected]> wrote: > Out of region use of IPv4, IPv6, or ASNs are valid justification for > additional number resources if the applicant is currently using at least the > equivalent of a /22 of IPv4, /44 of IPv6, or 1 ASN within the ARIN service > region, respectively. At least 10% of the additional resource request or > 20% of all an organization's resources must be used in the ARIN service > region.
Hi Andrew, How would that alleviate the concerns raised in the March legal assessment? As I understood it, they boiled down to: 1. Permitted use of addresses outregion could subject ARIN to the legal jurisdiction in the myriad localities where the addresses are used. Dealing with that could be super expensive and could distract and draw resources away from ARIN's core function: managing addresses for use in-region. 2. ARIN is bound by ICP-2 which is at least nominally contrary to outregion use of ARIN-managed addresses. Changes or clarifications to ICP-2 would be desired in order to proceed with an explicit outregion policy more permissive than, "no." The _fraction_ of use in presumptively non-permitted ways doesn't seem to be at issue. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
