Vote against..
In my opinion, the granting of a public IPv4 (or IPv6) address space
SHOULD come alone with some responsibility, including
'rwhois/SWIP/routing/rDNS obligations'.
I would rather have more work done by the community at large to reach
consensus on those things, even IF ARIN has little enforcement mandate
at this time, we should be able to reference it in discussions.
I suggest abandoning "Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2014-6" and work on
better language.
On 15-04-27 09:05 AM, ARIN wrote:
The ARIN Advisory Council (AC) met on 15 April 2015 and decided to
send the following to last call:
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2014-6: Remove Operational Reverse DNS
Text
Feedback is encouraged during the last call period. All comments should
be provided to the Public Policy Mailing List. This last call will
expire on 11 May 2015. After last call the AC will conduct their
last call review.
The draft policy text is below and available at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/
The ARIN Policy Development Process is available at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html
Regards,
Communications and Member Services
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
## * ##
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2014-6
Remove Operational Reverse DNS Text (was: Remove 7.1)
Date: 21 January 2014
AC's assessment of conformance with the Principles of Internet Number
Resource Policy:
2014-6 enables fair and impartial number resource administration by
removing technical statements that are not related to number policy from
the NRPM. It is technically sound to remove operational practice from
the NRPM; indeed this act serves as a forcing function for a best
practices document that is both more detailed and more approachable than
the policy statement that was removed. Discussion of the previous
revision of 2014-6 centered around "why are you fixing this for IPv4 and
not IPv6", and the most recent changes reflect that community feedback.
There has not been notable opposition to the notion of removing
operational language from the NRPM.
Problem Statement:
7.1 attempts to assert rules on rDNS management at ARIN. It fails to do
so because it only addresses in-addr.arpa (missing equally important
rules in ip6.arpa). It's also not based on any RFC; it's an arbitrary
decision made by ARIN technical staff. We should remove this text from
policy, as it represents operational practice rather than ARIN number
policy.
In feedback received at public policy meetings and on the PPML mailing
list, the Community expressed a desire for IPv4 and IPv6 policy on
reverse DNS to be congruent (that is to say, it makes no sense to remove
7.1 without addressing 6.5.6 which is similarly operationally
prescriptive) and bring this proposal forward again.
Policy statement:
Remove 7.1
Remove 6.5.6
Comments:
a.Timetable for implementation: Immediate
b.Anything else:
7.1. Maintaining IN-ADDRs
All ISPs receiving one or more distinct /16 CIDR blocks of IP addresses
from ARIN will be responsible for maintaining all IN-ADDR.ARPA domain
records for their respective customers. For blocks smaller than /16, and
for the segment of larger blocks smaller than /16, ARIN can maintain
IN-ADDRs.
6.5.6. Reverse lookup
When an RIR delegates IPv6 address space to an organization, it also
delegates the responsibility to manage the reverse lookup zone that
corresponds to the allocated IPv6 address space. Each organization
should properly manage its reverse lookup zone. When making an address
assignment, the organization must delegate to an assignee organization,
upon request, the responsibility to manage the reverse lookup zone that
corresponds to the assigned address.
#####
ARIN STAFF & LEGAL ASSESSMENT
Draft Policy ARIN-2014-6
Remove Operational Reverse DNS Text
Date of Assessment: March 17, 2015
1. Summary (Staff Understanding)
This proposal would remove 6.5.6 and 7.1, thus removing reverse DNS
language from the NRPM.
2. Comments
A. ARIN Staff Comments
This change to NRPM will not change the DNS service that ARIN performs.
This proposal can be implemented as written.
ARIN registration services staff occasionally receives a telephone or
email inquiry asking how reverse DNS services can be set up for a
company. In the cases the company is a downstream customer of an ISP who
has received a direct allocation from ARIN, staff explains this service
can be set up for them by their service provider. On rare occasion, the
company presses for a reference that states this is done by their ISP,
and not ARIN. In those cases staff will refer them to the language
currently in the NRPM.
In the case the language is removed from NRPM, ARIN staff will create a
resource for the ARIN public website that describes how ARIN's Reverse
DNS services are provided; including who is able to establish Reverse
DNS service for different types of registration records.
B. ARIN General Counsel â Legal Assessment
The policy does not create legal concerns.
3. Resource Impact
This policy would have minimal impact from an implementation standpoint.
It is estimated implementation would occur within 3 months after
ratification by the ARIN Board of Trustees. The following tasks will be
completed for implementation:
Versioned change to NRPM
Updated guidelines on ARIN website describing reverse DNS services (to
act as general information resource and serve as new reference point for
situation described in staff comments).
Staff training
4. Proposal / Draft Policy Text Assessed
Draft Policy ARIN-2014-6
Remove Operational Reverse DNS Text (was: Remove 7.1)
Date: 21 January 2015
Problem Statement:
7.1 attempts to assert rules on rDNS management at ARIN. It fails to do
so because it only addresses in-addr.arpa (missing equally important
rules in ip6.arpa). It's also not based on any RFC; it's an arbitrary
decision made by ARIN technical staff. We should remove this text from
policy, as it represents operational practice rather than ARIN number
policy.
In feedback received at public policy meetings and on the PPML mailing
list, the Community expressed a desire for IPv4 and IPv6 policy on
reverse DNS to be congruent (that is to say, it makes no sense to remove
7.1 without addressing 6.5.6 which is similarly operationally
prescriptive) and bring this proposal forward again.
Policy statement:
Remove 7.1
Remove 6.5.6
Comments:
a.Timetable for implementation: Immediate
b.Anything else:
7.1. Maintaining IN-ADDRs
All ISPs receiving one or more distinct /16 CIDR blocks of IP addresses
from ARIN will be responsible for maintaining all IN-ADDR.ARPA domain
records for their respective customers. For blocks smaller than /16, and
for the segment of larger blocks smaller than /16, ARIN can maintain
IN-ADDRs.
6.5.6. Reverse lookup
When an RIR delegates IPv6 address space to an organization, it also
delegates the responsibility to manage the reverse lookup zone that
corresponds to the allocated IPv6 address space. Each organization
should properly manage its reverse lookup zone. When making an address
assignment, the organization must delegate to an assignee organization,
upon request, the responsibility to manage the reverse lookup zone that
corresponds to the assigned address.
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
--
"Catch the Magic of Linux..."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Peddemors, President/CEO LinuxMagic Inc.
Visit us at http://www.linuxmagic.com @linuxmagic
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A Wizard IT Company - For More Info http://www.wizard.ca
"LinuxMagic" a Registered TradeMark of Wizard Tower TechnoServices Ltd.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
604-682-0300 Beautiful British Columbia, Canada
This email and any electronic data contained are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed.
Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely
those of the author and are not intended to represent those of the company.
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
