On 6/25/2015 6:14 AM, William Herrin wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:07 PM, ARIN <[email protected]> wrote: >> Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1 >> Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments > On second thought, I withdraw my support and oppose the policy draft > as written. While I approve of the policy in concept, the draft > commits two errors which should be rectified before it goes to the > board: > > First, it "replaces" large sections of text to which there is no > obvious modification. This lacks clarity, making it needlessly > difficult to understand what the draft actually changes. The draft > should be winnowed to just the text which changes. > > Second, it renumbers existing 6.5.8.1e to 6.5.8.1f and then replaces > 6.5.8.1e with text which is not derivative of the original. This is > bad practice, as it confuses external references to the NRPM. Indeed, > ARIN's normal practice has been to retire rather than replace or > reorder section numbers which no longer serve their original function. > > With those two changes made, I believe I would support the draft. > > Just so I understand you are opposed to the 'editorial' way the policy was written, not the content of the actual changes?
Andrew _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
