On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 6:08 PM, David Farmer <[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/21/15 07:27 , Martin Hannigan wrote: > > [ clip ] > > Conceptually, I've always liked and even preferred the RIPE and APNIC last > /8 policy, but we couldn't agree on it in 2009, and our options are now > limited. If you have a specific suggestion based on the realities of today, > -- > I'd probably do it by rewriting 4.10 to - retain the /10 and re designate it for run out (yes, 2 are allocated) - restrict all assignments by it from being transferable except by 8.2 - restrict to corporate holdings in aggregate, not by org id <-- opex heavy, discuss - provide new "entrants" and existing resource holders with a single /24, forever. - no needs assessment, just ask and then don't come back Best, -M<
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
