On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 12:38:51PM -0700, John Springer wrote: > Dear PPML, > > ARIN-2016-4 was accepted as a Draft Policy in June. > > https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2016_4.html > > Expressions of support or opposition to the DP are solicited to assist in > evaluating what to do with it in the run up to the meeting in Dallas. > > At the moment, it appears technically sound and fair to me, but expressions > of support will be required to advance.
Support. > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 8:40 AM, ARIN <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 16 June 2016 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) advanced the following > > Proposal to Draft Policy status: > > > > ARIN-prop-229: Transfers for new entrants > > > > This Draft Policy has been numbered and titled: > > > > Draft Policy ARIN-2016-4: Transfers for new entrants > > > > Draft Policy ARIN-2016-4 is below and can be found at: > > https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2016_4.html > > > > You are encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on PPML. The AC will > > evaluate the discussion in order to assess the conformance of this draft > > policy with ARIN's Principles of Internet number resource policy as stated > > in the Policy Development Process (PDP). Specifically, these principles are: > > > > * Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration > > * Technically Sound > > * Supported by the Community > > > > The PDP can be found at: > > https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html > > > > Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at: > > https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html > > > > Regards, > > > > Communications and Member Services > > American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) > > > > ########## > > > > Draft Policy ARIN-2016-4: Transfers for new entrants > > > > Date: 21 June, 2016 > > Problem Statement: > > > > New organizations without existing IPv4 space may not always be able to > > qualify for an initial allocation under NRPM 4.2, particularly if they are > > categorized as ISPs and subject to 4.2.2.1.1. Use of /24. Now that ARIN's > > free pool is exhausted, 4.2.1.6. Immediate need states that "These cases > > are exceptional", but that is no longer correct. End user organizations > > requiring less a /24 of address space may also be unable to acquire space > > from their upstream ISP, and may instead need to receive a /24 from ARIN > > via transfer. > > > > Policy statement: > > > > Replace Section 4.2.2 with: > > > > 4.2.2. Initial allocation to ISPs > > > > "All ISP organizations without direct assignments or allocations from ARIN > > qualify for an initial allocation of up to a /21, subject to ARIN's minimum > > allocation size. Organizations may qualify for a larger initial allocation > > by documenting how the requested allocation will be utilized within 24 > > months for specified transfers, or three months otherwise. ISPs renumbering > > out of their previous address space will be given a reasonable amount of > > time to do so, and any blocks they are returning will not count against > > their utilization. > > > > Replace Section 4.3.2 to read: > > > > 4.3.2 Minimum assignment > > > > ARIN's minimum assignment for end-user organizations is a /24. > > > > End-user organizations without direct assignments or allocations from ARIN > > qualify for an initial assignment of ARIN's minimum assignment size. > > > > Replace the first two sentences of Section 4.3.3. Utilization rate to read: > > > > Organizations may qualify for a larger initial allocation by providing > > appropriate details to verify their 24-month growth projection for > > specified transfers, or 12 months otherwise. > > > > Resulting new section 4.3.3 will be: > > > > Organizations may qualify for a larger initial allocation, by providing > > appropriate details to verify their 24-month growth projection for > > specified transfers, or 12 months otherwise. > > > > The basic criterion that must be met is a 50% utilization rate within one > > year. > > > > A greater utilization rate may be required based on individual network > > requirements. Please refer to RFC 2050 for more information on utilization > > guidelines. > > > > Comments: > > > > Timetable for implementation: Immediate > > > > Anything else > > > > The text in 4.2.2 "for specified transfers, or three months otherwise" and > > the text in 4.3.3 "for specified transfers, or 12 months otherwise" should > > be stricken if ARIN-prop-227 is adopted. _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
