Yes, this removes the Caribbean and rural text that is in the current Community Networks policy. I believe that was intentional, maybe it should be noted in the comments to make that clear. Or, do you believe we should keep that or similar text?
Additional comments on this policy would be appreciated. Thanks. On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Richard J. Letts <[email protected]> wrote: > 6.5.9.1 says more than was quoted. > > The bit that was missing is "For community networks located in rural > regions (population less than 2,500) or in the Caribbean and North Atlantic > Islands Sector, the numbers in these qualification criteria may be relaxed > at ARIN's discretion." > > More than half of the 'cities' (55% to be exact) in the State of > Washington have populations less than 2500 people -- so if the 50/100 was > really an impediment an applicant/ARIN has a way out of it. > > This is somewhat beside the point: I'm all for getting rid of inapplicable > sections of the NPRM and the HD-ratio seems to be one of them > > /RjL > > -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:[email protected] Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 ===============================================
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
