Bill, The intent of this policy text was that an organization receiving a sparsely used /16 would transfer the unused bits to other organization(s) that could use them. In your case, if you transferred all the /24s that are currently unused (without any renumbering), would the blocks you're keeping meet a 50% utilization threshold, if you include planned 24 month growth?
-Scott On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:54 AM, William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 1:32 PM, David Farmer <[email protected]> wrote: > > However, I still need to know what you think of making the > > transfer part explicitly voluntarily, would that eliminate your > > worry about the current language? > > Hi David, > > I think "voluntary" in that context sounds a lot like "voluntold." So > no, it does not resolve my concern. > > Regards, > Bill Herrin > > > > -- > William Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] > Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
