On 16-12-20 11:32 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
You can simply modify it to say that instead of contacting every indirect POC every year that you are going to select a random group of POCs and contact them - this will verify if the subnet holders are filing SWIPS that are accurate or if they are just making up stuff to meet utilization requirements.
And if you need extra ammunition, we can always send examples of networks where the POC's described are shown to be probably false, and all belonging to one individual, based on their spamming habits, common domains, tactics, and other evidence ;)
A couple of calls to the 'listed' POC would quickly stop that practice.. -- "Catch the Magic of Linux..." ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Michael Peddemors, President/CEO LinuxMagic Inc. Visit us at http://www.linuxmagic.com @linuxmagic ------------------------------------------------------------------------ A Wizard IT Company - For More Info http://www.wizard.ca "LinuxMagic" a Registered TradeMark of Wizard Tower TechnoServices Ltd. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 604-682-0300 Beautiful British Columbia, Canada This email and any electronic data contained are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and are not intended to represent those of the company. _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
