> On Feb 3, 2017, at 07:47 , William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:49 AM, Job Snijders <[email protected]> wrote: >> Please keep in mind that this thread was about removing barriers, to >> enable RPKI innovation. > > Hi folks, > > Is ARIN the right place for an RPKI registry? They seem... reluctant. > It's not just the data for relying parties; they won't publish RPKI > information for the legacy registrants without those registrants first > entering contractual relationships unrelated to RPKI. > > Classically ARIN has had a minimalist role in routing policy > decisions. This has been considered a good thing. Fundamentally, RPKI > is routing policy. Maybe another organization should be created to > manage RPKI in North America, one which doesn't suffer ARIN's mindset. >
Since ARIN is the registry, there’s really no other authoritative source for the information. As such, nobody else is in a proper position to certify the resource holdings. Owen _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
