I disagree… First, I think it’s actually harder to understand. Second, I think it is a bad idea to create multiple specifications or specification points for the pre-authorization window because it creates a potential for accidental desynchronization in future policy efforts.
Owen > On Feb 22, 2017, at 10:48 , Jason Schiller <[email protected]> wrote: > > I got the impression from Scott that alternate text was more clear and > preferred. > (note I'm not advocating for it, I believe it has no impact on > implementation). > > 8.5.7 Alternative Additional IPv4 Address Block Criteria > > In lieu of 8.5.5 and 8.5.6, organizations may qualify for additional IPv4 > address blocks by demonstrating 80% utilization of their currently allocated > space. If they do so, they are pre-authorized for a two year window to > receive one or more transfers up to the total size of their current ARIN IPv4 > address holdings, with a maximum size of /16. > > An organization may qualify via 8.5.7 for a total of a /16 equivalent in any > 6 month period. > > ___Jason > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:57 PM, ARIN <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > On 16 February 2017 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) advanced the following > Draft Policy to Recommended Draft Policy status: > > ARIN-2016-3: Alternative simplified criteria for justifying small IPv4 > transfers > > The text of the Recommended Draft Policy is below, and may also be found at: > https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2016_3.html > <https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2016_3.html> > > You are encouraged to discuss all Recommended Draft Policies on PPML > prior to their presentation at the next ARIN Public Policy Meeting (PPM) or > Public Policy Consultation (PPC). PPML and PPC discussions are invaluable to > the AC when determining community consensus. > > The PDP can be found at: > https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html <https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html> > > Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at: > https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html > <https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html> > > Regards, > > Sean Hopkins > Policy Analyst > American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) > > > Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2016-3: Alternative simplified criteria for > justifying small IPv4 transfers > > Version Date: 16 February 2017 > > AC's Statement of Conformance with ARIN's Principles of Internet Number > Resource Policy > > This proposal is technically sound and enables fair and impartial number > policy by allowing transfers to specified recipients of blocks of a certain > size to occur without a needs assessment performed by ARIN staff. The Staff > and Legal Assessment raised no material issues, and there has been consistent > support on both the mailing list and at the Dallas ARIN meeting for > incorporating this mechanism into NRPM. > > Problem Statement: > > ARIN transfer policy currently inherits all its demonstrated need > requirements for IPv4 transfers from NRPM sections 4. Because that section > was written primarily to deal with free pool allocations, it is much more > complicated than is really necessary for transfers. > > This proposal allows organizations using 80% of their current space to double > their current holdings via 8.3 or 8.4 specified transfers, up to a /16 > equivalent. > > Policy Statement: > > Add a new section: > > 8.5.7 Alternative Additional IPv4 Address Block Criteria > > In lieu of 8.5.5 and 8.5.6, organizations may qualify for additional IPv4 > address blocks by demonstrating 80% utilization of their currently allocated > space. If they do so, they qualify to receive one or more transfers up to the > total size of their current ARIN IPv4 address holdings, with a maximum size > of /16. > > An organization may qualify via 8.5.7 for a total of a /16 equivalent in any > 6 month period. > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > <http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml> > Please contact [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you experience any > issues. > > > > -- > _______________________________________________________ > Jason Schiller|NetOps|[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>|571-266-0006 > > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
