John, Having personally stood up at many members meetings, and requested my fees be increased or even doubled if that is what it take to continue on-going IT development and enhancements...
I do NOT think it is a worthwhile investment to add IT support to catalog the type of transfer request justification. It is even less important going forward with the new policy changes which eliminates the need for smaller than /15 per year requests to use this justification. I will not be submitting a ACSP. I was hoping there was a general sense from processing requests that might help us to understand if certain request pathways seem like that are never used, inconsequentially used, used a bit, used more than one would think, used quite a bit, used more than half the time, used most frequently, etc. I don't think it is worthwhile to labor this point. ___Jason On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 5:39 PM, John Curran <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8 May 2017, at 1:12 PM, Jason Schiller <[email protected]> wrote: > > .. > Can staff sort transfer authorization requests into the following > categorized? > > A. Current Consumption Rate > Request considers only current rate, projected out over a time window. > - e.g. we used a /15 over the last 12 months. at this rate a /14 is > a two year supply. > > B. Growth rate > Request considers current growth rate, projected over a time window. > - e.g. we used a /16 between 01/15 - 12/2015 > we used a /15 over the last 12 months. > at this rate we double every year. > if we keep yearly doubling, then a /14 and a /13 is a two > year supply. > > C. Hi bread > Request considers current growth rate, but requests more than the > current rate over some time horizon due to other reasons for > acceleration, > such as entry into new markets, increase in manufacturing of hand > sets, etc. > > > D. Future looking > Request is purely future looking. > - e.g. We anticipate the sale of 1 Million handsets over the next year. > 50-80% of those handsets will use our application and require > an IP. > > Do you see all of these types? > Is one type more dominate then the others? > Is one type more successful than others? > Does one type require more transaction time? more back and forth? > > > Jason - > > We have not been cataloging transfer requests via such criteria, and > hence cannot provide these statistics for transfer requests that have > been made to date. We can begin categorizing them and recording > them for future transfers, but would need to specifically augment the > processes and systems accordingly. Such work would need to be > prioritized against other existing enhancement requests, so submit > a suggestion via the ARIN Consultation and Suggestion Process > <https://www.arin.net/participate/acsp/acsp.html> if you consider > this functionality a priority. > > Thanks! > /John > > John Curran > President and CEO > ARIN > > -- _______________________________________________________ Jason Schiller|NetOps|[email protected]|571-266-0006
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
