Bill, That’s not particularly relevant as LIRs are not at issue in the policy proposal.
It speaks only to RIRs (i.e. AfriNIC, APNIC, ARIN, LACNIC, RIPE-NCC) and NIRs (e.g. JPNIC, CNNIC, KRNIC, …). Owen > On Jun 20, 2017, at 10:33 PM, William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:37 PM, ARIN <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > + Recipient RIR policy must not permit transfers to other RIRs or NIRs whose > policies do not support bi-directional transfers. > > Hello, > > I support this policy in concept but I'm forced to note that almost without > exception, ARIN LIRs do not support bi-directional transfers. > > Since a handful of LIRs have started leasing addresses absent any network > services (ARIN treats ISP and LIR as the same thing) and a handful of NIRs > also control their local network services, it seems to me like we might get > in to some definitional trouble here. > > Regards, > Bill Herrin > > > > -- > William Herrin ................ [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/ > <http://www.dirtside.com/>> > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
