On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 8:52 AM, John Curran <[email protected]> wrote:
> Such a separation doesn’t preclude the community from adopting policy which > references the present or future state of routing (note, for example, the > use of > “multihoming” criteria in several portions of the NRPM), but folks are > reminded > that in Internet number resource policy we should only be specifying how > the > ARIN registry is to be administered, not how things are to be routed, > since the > latter is up to each ISP. > Hi John, In the interests of clarifying your remarks: ARIN does not set or even recommend routing policy. Participants in the ARIN policy process routinely consider industry routing practices, IETF recommendations, etc. when suggesting ARIN address management policy and ARIN routinely enacts such policy. Right? Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
