Actually, let me revise that; I'm willing to recognize at least the possibility there is a legitimate community interest in having records for assignments that are shorter than /40 for IPv6 and /24 for IPv4. Why, those numbers? They are the sizes at the bottom of ARIN's fee schedule, if anything smaller is the same fee, I'm not sure where there is a compelling community policy interest.
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 4:07 PM, David Farmer <[email protected]> wrote: > Honestly, I could live with it just those three lines. However, I'm > willing to recognize at least the possibility there is a legitimate > community interest in having records for assignments that are shorter than > /48. > > As for IPv4, I'd also be just fine with those three lines. Again, > recognizing at least the possibility there is a legitimate community > interest in having records for assignments that are shorter than /24 > > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Tony Hain <[email protected]> wrote: > >> While I agree with the general direction David is heading, his text is >> still overly complex to deal with the goal. This whole thread only requires >> 3 lines: >> >> >> >> Reallocations MUST provide SWIP. >> >> Requests by the assignee MUST provide SWIP. >> Anything appearing independently in the global routing table SHOULD >> provide SWIP. >> >> >> >> All the rest is noise that doesn’t add to solving any problem known to >> mankind, and is simply an artifact of the IPv4-think insane conservation >> mindset. Size is irrelevant in both protocol versions, and even if you >> think it is, the only time it comes up is in #3. In any case the length of >> #3 might change over time, and there is no reason the policy text needs to >> change to track it. If something is independent, no matter what it’s length >> is, the intent is to have accurate contact info. >> >> >> >> Saying anything more is trying to legislate ISP behavior, which is >> explicitly outside the scope of ARIN. >> >> >> >> Tony >> > > > -- > =============================================== > David Farmer Email:[email protected] > Networking & Telecommunication Services > Office of Information Technology > University of Minnesota > 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 <(612)%20626-0815> > Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 <(612)%20812-9952> > =============================================== > -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:[email protected] Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 ===============================================
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
