While the most recent drafts have not dealt with IPv4, in the last round
there was a proposal to require registration upon request of the
downstream customer of their IPv6 assignment.
If we intend to provide that power to require registration for IPv6
customer assignments upon request, in fairness we should also use the same
language in a new 4.2.3.7.4 to allow static IPv4 customers that same
power. I suggest /32 as the limit, as /29 or more already has required
registration. The same problems identfied in not being able to register
assignments with ARIN for v6 are also true for v4 assignments between
those limits.
Since both protocols are still being addressed and attempts are being
made by the draft to make v6 equal or better than v4, the title should
remain. The only thing we have done is not shift the v4 limit of /29.
Albert Erdmann
Network Administrator
Paradise On Line Inc.
While we???re turning the crank, can we please fix the title since IPv4
is no longer relevant to the proposal and there???s really no
equalization happening?
Perhaps ???Improved Registration Requirements for IPv6???
Owen
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
