In message <[email protected]>, John Curran <[email protected]> wrote:
>You seek an express determination that inherently judicial in nature from >ARIN; i.e. from a mere technical coordination body. Not really. I seek an acceptance of what, apparently, the duly constituted arbitration panel already found in this case. I understand that the panel may not have said so explicitly, but the judement is clear. This guy is a crook and guilty of fraud. But I understand why you, Ryan, and everyone would prefer to wait until we can all see the video of the perp walk, with the guy in handcuffs and and an orange jumpsuit befoer taking this the next step. I just don't happen to feel that waiting for that is or should be necessary. From my reading of the relevant documents, there isn't really a whole hell of a lot of ambiguity here, especially given the on-the-record testamony in the South Carolina case that this guy comitted fraud. But yea, if you and Ryan did actually refer this matter out... as you most certainly should have done... then I suppose that it will be orange jumpsuit time soon enough. The Feds don't always move that fast, but mail fraud and wire fraud tend to get them motivated and moving. >Alas, I'll have to manage with that which is simply available to me as >John Curran It is likely insufficient for the job of Internet Emperor >which you seem to be strongly advocating for, but >should be enough to keep ARIN, a mere Regional Internet Registry, running >in a fair and equitable manner. John, I did not, have not, and will not criticise -you- for the specific ills that I have here bemoaned. Rather, I hold all and -only- the entire ARIN membership to account for what I feel is a lack of agressive policy for dealing with such kinds of crooks as the one featured in today's press releases. You, in contrast, are doing exactly what I would hope and expect from any good executive branch, i.e. you are faithfully carrying out the will of the legislature, which in this case is the whole ARIN membership. They made the policy, or lack thereof, not you, and I am ever mindful of that. And no, I do not wish a Caesar, and that should be evident from my prior implied praise of men who were the very opposite of Caesar... men like Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Hamilton, Madison. (Well, maybe not Hamilton, but you get the idea.) I hope for courageous and self-effacing leadership, without the kinds of over-excessive concerns for one's own private and petty personal interests that seem so often to be the driving force in ARIN policy debates. But to be clear, I hope for this leadership to emerge from the membership, who are and who rightly should be the makers of policy. Regards, rfg _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
