ok, so you don't like the "use 127.0.0.0/8" proposal. fine. RFC 1918 space is too small. fine. IPv6 is too hard. fine.
Shortly after discussions started on RF 1918, I proposed the following: Since NAT exists, direct peering on a global scale will be fairly restrictive, one should consider inverting RFC 1918. Use those addresses strictly and only for global interconnection/peering. This would free up all other IPv4 space to sit behind your NAT and usable in your enterprise networks. Thats almost an entire IPv6 /32 of space for everyone, without having to migrate to IPv6. Problem solved. Your welcome. /Wm
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
