Hello,
3. Is there any potential deleterious impact should this language be
adopted into the NRPM?
I speak neither for or against this draft policy.
I would like to note that the delegation of ip6.arpa zones are currently
cleanly delineated. In the simple and current example, each RIR is
delegated a /12 reverse zone for their IPv6 /12 blocks issued to them by
IANA.
If this draft policy results in individual registrations of /32s (and the
like) being transferred among RIRs, then the RIR engineering teams will
need to implement a solution for rDNS. While the RIR engineering teams
very capably and reliably do so today for IPv4, I think it's fair to say
that system has experienced periodic fragility over the past few decades.
A complete answer to Chris's question also requires knowing how inter-RIR
v6 transfers would impact RPKI (if at all).
Writing solely in my personal capacity,
David
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
