On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 2:58 AM Mueller, Milton L <[email protected]> wrote: > I am not a lawyer, but can say from firsthand experience that ARIN’s present stance as administrator and steward of the registry makes dealing with many disputes rather straightforward, and if we were a party of significant financial interest in the outcomes, then there are various legal options for enforcement that would become quite challenging or altogether unavaialble, and thus require us to go further down the litigation/arbitration to obtain the appropriate outcomes for the community. This is not a “highly speculative” outcome of monetization, but rather inevitable outcome as judges reasonable view > > MM: This is pure speculation. You do not have a single fact or a single case to back it up.
This is a non-problem. Directly return recovered funds to the registrants (bypassing ARIN discretion) and ARIN (the organization) no longer has any financial interest in the outcomes. The gains are to the same people from which the recovery occurs. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin [email protected] https://bill.herrin.us/
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
