I also don't believe this is a good change to be made for the same reasons outlines by staff, therefore I can't support it as well

Thanks
Fernando

On 30/07/2019 16:49, Brian Jones wrote:
With the clarification that organizations will be removed from the waiting list if they receive an allocation for facilitating their IPv6 deployment, I no longer support this proposal for the reasons outlined by the ARIN staff below. My organization will not be impacted by this but I can understand where some could be detrimentally effected by this change. Receiving an allocation for deploying IPv6 should not be tied to the waiting list for a regular IPv4 assignment IMO.

--
Brian E Jones, CSP-SM, CSP-PO
NI&S Virginia Tech
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

On Jul 30, 2019, at 1:33 PM, Kat Hunter <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

All- Staff and legal review has been completed for 2019-9. Please take a moment to review the comments. For those that supported this, do you still support the policy given the staff notes. Additionally, we'd like to hear from anyone that this may impact in a negative way.

Policy: https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2019_9/
Staff and Legal Review https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2019_9/#slr

"ARIN Staff Comments

This policy could be implemented as written. Current policy is that any organization on the waiting list that receives IPv4 addresses through a transfer are removed from the waiting list, but those receiving an NRPM 4.10 (Dedicated IPv4 Block to Facilitate IPv6 Deployment) assignment are not removed from the waiting list. The proposed change would result those organizations receiving an NRPM 4.10 assignment also being removed from the waiting list.

Staff notes that adding the “…or an allocation request fulfilled under Section 4.10…” may be detrimental to some organizations, as address space received per NRPM 4.10 must be used in a manner consistent with IPv6 translation services and cannot be used for other purposes such as customer assignments, shared hosting services, etc.

Organizations need IPv4 address space to assign to their customers, and many organizations will request a block from the Waiting List to be used for their customer assignments but still need some IPv4 space for deployment of IPv6 translation services as outlined in section NRPM 4.10. Removing organizations from the Waiting List when they receive a NRPM 4.10 assignment would hinder the existing IPv4 operations & growth of organizations, and may provide a disincentive to IPv6 deployment."



-Kat Hunter


On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 1:42 PM Brian Jones <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I support this revised version of draft policy ARIN-2019-9 as
    written.

    Brian


    On Thu, May 23, 2019, 12:44 PM ARIN <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        The following has been revised:

        * Draft Policy ARIN-2019-9: Clarify Interactions Between NRPM
        4.10 IPv6
        Transition Space Requests and NRPM 4.1.8.2 Unmet Needs Requests

        Revised text is below and can be found at:
        https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2019_9/

        You are encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on PPML. The
        AC will
        evaluate the discussion in order to assess the conformance of
        this Draft
        Policy with ARIN's Principles of Internet number resource
        policy as
        stated in the Policy Development Process (PDP). Specifically,
        these
        principles are:

        * Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration
        * Technically Sound
        * Supported by the Community

        The PDP can be found at:
        https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/pdp/

        Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at:
        https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/

        Regards,

        Sean Hopkins
        Policy Analyst
        American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)



        Draft Policy ARIN-2019-9: Clarify Interactions Between NRPM
        4.10 IPv6
        Transition Space Requests and NRPM 4.1.8.2 Unmet Needs Requests

        Problem Statement:

        It has been observed that an organization requesting IPv4
        resources
        under NRPM Section 4.10, Dedicated IPv4 Block To Facilitate IPv6
        Deployment, can also request similar or the same resources
        under Section
        4.2.1.8, Unmet Needs. This proposal aims to remove this
        potential for
        duplicate requests under these sections.

        Policy Statement:

        Section 4.1.8.2, Unmet Needs:

        Current language: Any requests met through a transfer will be
        considered
        fulfilled and removed from the waiting list.

        Proposed language:

        Any requests met through a transfer or an allocation request
        fulfilled
        under Section 4.10 will be considered fulfilled and removed
        from the
        waiting list.

        Timetable for Implementation: Immediate

        Anything Else:

        Currently, organizations can receive no more than a /24 at a
        time under
        Section 4.10. However, Proposal ARIN-PROP-266, submitted by
        Chris Tacit
        and myself, could potentially allow an org to receive up to a
        /21 under
        that section, widening the potential for abuse by
        “double-dipping”
        waiting list and transition space requests. As such, this
        proposal
        should be considered in that context.
        _______________________________________________
        ARIN-PPML
        You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
        the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>).
        Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
        https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
        Please contact [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you
        experience any issues.

    _______________________________________________
    ARIN-PPML
    You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
    the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>).
    Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
    https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
    Please contact [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you
    experience any issues.



_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to