I believe that in policy clarity is always preferable to ambiguity. As such, I encourage clarification.
Owen > On Oct 9, 2019, at 08:58 , Joe Provo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > <ARIN AC hat but using registered posting address> > > Hello again folks, > > After digesting the Staff & Legal Review ( > https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2019_12/#slr ), > an issue was raised at the last AC meeting regarding the clarity > of the proposal. The specific concern is that while the policy > speaks to the surviving entity's ability to hold number resources, > and the existing staff action is to allow such entities to retain > resources, the lack of stipulation that new resources cannot be > obtained introduces ambiguity. > > So would the parties interested in ARIN-2019-12 please indicate > if they feel if the policy is: > - clear as-is and doesn't need adjustment > - in need of clarification in this regrd > - in need of clarification in this and additional regards > > ...or, as usual, whatever else! :-) > > Thanks in advance for more input! > > Joe > </ARIN AC hat> > > > -- > Posted from my personal account - see X-Disclaimer header. > Joe Provo / Gweep / Earthling > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
