I prefer this wording to any of the previous proposals. I believe it
satisfies the intent of all the previous proposals and I don't have any
specific problems with it. I think it covers all the issues and edge cases.
On 10/23/2019 01:38 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
Joe,
On M&A, I agree it’s a corner case, but there is the possibility of a
scenario
involving marriage, divorce, adoption, etc. to fall within section 8.2.
Not sure it’s a sufficient case to bother addressing.
I do like the additional clarity, but agree that we should avoid
language that
is specific to corporations.
Suggest:
“M&A activity resulting in the surviving legal entity having no presence
in the
ARIN service region will be permitted and such entity may retain any
existing
number resource holdings under their existing ARIN RSA.”
I believe this addresses all natural and artificial legal entities in
virtually all
cases mentioned to date while preserving the core intent of the original
proposal.
Owen
--
John Santos
Evans Griffiths & Hart, Inc.
781-861-0670 ext 539
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
