Hi,
I wish to express my support to ARIN-2019-19.
We all have our fair share of "undue burdens". :-)
Best Regards,
Carlos Friaças
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 20:51:22
From: John Curran <[email protected]>
To: Michel Py <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2019-19: Require IPv6 Before
Receiving Section 8 IPv4 Transfers
On 6 Nov 2019, at 3:23 PM, Michel Py <[email protected]> wrote:
There is no law that says I need IPv6, therefore the courts will hear my case
for undue burden.
Michel -
As ARIN is not a governmental authority (but rather administering the registry
on behalf of the community via a set of contracts), you?ll probably need to
look instead to contract law doctrine (e.g. unconscionability) for possible
grounds for a cause of action. Given that ARIN is only enforcing community
policy and your ability to make productive use of any address space is
predicated upon cooperation with the same community, you might find it
difficult to argue that you wish the benefits of cooperation minus whatever
obligations that community collectively establishes.
Best wishes,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
American Registry for Internet Numbers
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
