Support. This should be a no-op for actual allocations, but improves clarity 
and consistency. 

Scott

> On Dec 24, 2019, at 4:38 AM, ARIN <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 19 December 2019, the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted "ARIN-prop-279: 
> Harmonization of Maximum Allocation Requirements under Sections 4.1.8 (ARIN 
> Waitlist) and 4.2.2 (Initial Allocation to ISPs)" as a Draft Policy.
> 
> Draft Policy ARIN-2019-20 is below and can be found at:
> 
> https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2019_20/
> 
> You are encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on PPML. The AC will 
> evaluate the discussion in order to assess the conformance of this draft 
> policy with ARIN's Principles of Internet number resource policy as stated in 
> the Policy Development Process (PDP). Specifically, these principles are:
> 
> * Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration
> * Technically Sound
> * Supported by the Community
> 
> The PDP can be found at:
> https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/pdp/
> 
> Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at:
> https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Sean Hopkins
> Policy Analyst
> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
> 
> 
> 
> Draft Policy ARIN-2019-20: Harmonization of Maximum Allocation Requirements 
> under Sections 4.1.8 (ARIN Waitlist) and 4.2.2 (Initial Allocation to ISPs)
> 
> Problem Statement:
> 
> Under the current ARIN waitlist policy (section 4.1.8), ARIN now only issues 
> IPv4 assignments/allocations (excluding section 4.4 and 4.10 space) from the 
> ARIN waitlist. The maximum size aggregate for which an organization may 
> qualify at any one time is a /22. On the other hand, the current initial 
> allocations to ISPs policy (section 4.2.2) provides that direct assignments 
> or allocations from ARIN qualify for an initial allocation of up to a /21, 
> subject to ARIN’s minimum allocation size. This proposal seeks to resolve the 
> conflict in the maximum allocation size requirements between the two sections 
> in favour of the requirement in the waitlist policy, since that is the one 
> that is intended to govern at the present time. Reconciling the policy 
> language as proposed herein will avoid confusion by readers of the NRPM.
> 
> Policy statement:
> 
> Change the first sentence of section 4.2.2 to read:
> 
> “All ISP organizations without direct assignments or allocations from ARIN 
> qualify for an initial allocation of up to a /22, subject to ARIN’s minimum 
> allocation size.”
> 
> Timetable for Implementation: Immediate
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to