On 2020-06-23 11:42, John Santos wrote:
While I support this in principle, what is to prevent someone from violating the intent by getting a /40 and assigning /56's to 40,000 customers, instead of /48's to no more than 250 customers?
I don't think that's the intent of this draft policy but even if it was, enforcement of a ISP's IPv6 assignment structure for customers seems out of scope for ARIN.
I am in favour of the draft policy as it is currently written. I hope this encourages small networks to pick up a IPv6 prefix and start on deployment while not worrying about increasing their ARIN related expenses.
-- Sadiq Saif [AS393949] https://sadiqsaif.com _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
