Hi all,

I just want to restate my support for the implementation of ARIN-2020-2. Having read all the opinions, I still think the implementation of this policy is appropriate. It's been pointed out by several people that this whole situation was an impetus for many ARIN community members to learn more about, and take a more active role in, the policy process. I think it's also worth pointing out that ARIN-2019-16 made its way through the policy process fairly quickly compared to many other policies I am seeing today. It was only formally put to the PPML list in April of 2019 and implemented by July 2019. I don't think it's entirely clear that all relevant stakeholders had the opportunity to provide input on this policy, given the time frame.

Overall, I agree with the policy goals of ARIN-2019-16. I simply believe that some of the changes should not have been retroactive. If an organization was willing to accept a /22 to meet some of their needs, I think they should have been given the opportunity to receive that address space regardless of their current holdings. In my view, this would have been the most equitable and fair way to implement the policy change. This allows the policy to address the reality that there isn't sufficient returned space to offer larger blocks than a /22 anymore, and allows the 60 month waiting period to take effect and deter any possibly fraudulent requests from remaining on the list, without punishing organizations for someone else's fraud. Going forward, these organizations have not been led along by waiting for months on a list, and are fully aware that the size of their organization's current holdings restrict them to the transfer market for additional IPv4 space.

Thanks,
Isaiah Olson
Olson Tech, LLC

_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to