I am also opposed.
The limited amount of addresses that will come into the wait list at this
point do not make it worth having that waiting list. I would rather
divert all returns into the reserved pools such as 4.10.
I also agree that it appears to have been drafted to benefit limited
parties, rather than the community at large.
It is about time for those IPv4 only networks that need more space to
finally make the step to IPv6, where address space will not be an issue
for a long long time.
Albert Erdmann
Network Administrator
Paradise On Line Inc.
On Tue, 12 Jan 2021, John Santos wrote:
I do not support this policy or petition.
I also don't understand why organizations desiring more than a very small
block have any reasonable expectation of it ever being available from the
wait list.
It's like demanding a reserved seat in one of the lifeboats that the Titanic
would have had if it met modern lifeboat capacity standards.
I think this whole discussion is a waste of time.
--
John Santos
Evans Griffiths & Hart, Inc.
781-861-0670 ext 539
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
