On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 06:40:19PM -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote: [snip] > It is. However, the text in Section 10 has to be agreed by all five RIR's > which means it goes off to global policy land. Just thinking out of the > box. Normally, I would agree, but changing section 10 for editorial changes > is a problem regardless.
Then IMO we should incorporate into the developing style guide "don't touch section 10". > > The AC shepherds have the pen, so they certainly can sever the trivial > > change to section 10 if it is truly believed to trigger the End Times. > > > I could be wrong. If it goes forward and I am, beer is on me. But you'll be > waiting at least two years in theory. Which is still a waste of time for > such a change IMHO. However, if it does go forward, count on me to start > the when is a change a change discussion. Point is, the shepherds could trim the section 10 bit and move it along if non-substantive changes to section 10 is really a problem. -- Posted from my personal account - see X-Disclaimer header. Joe Provo / Gweep / Earthling _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
