Hi Bill,
It's true that the rapid rise in IPv4 prices has incentivized some owners to
hold and lease, but of course it has likewise incentivized some owners to sell
at the high prices.
If the address sale market dries up but leasing is available, why is that a
travesty?
Those in need still get addresses.
The leasing agents you mention are getting paid for a service provided, is
there a problem there?
Regards,
Mike
---- On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 22:29:28 -0400 William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote
----
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 5:42 PM Mike Burns <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
> May I ask if you're thinking changes with the understand that all of the
> addresses being considered are going to be purchased.
Hi Mike,
I suppose my real worry is that the address sale market dries up
because it's more lucrative to lease them. With leasing agents running
around helping address holders monetize their IP addresses through
leasing in order to take a cut. That would be a travesty.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William Herrin
mailto:[email protected]
https://bill.herrin.us/
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
