> On Sep 11, 2021, at 19:59 , Joe Maimon <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Owen DeLong via ARIN-PPML wrote:
>>
>>> On Sep 10, 2021, at 19:29 , William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 5:42 PM Mike Burns <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> May I ask if you're thinking changes with the understand that all of the
>>>> addresses being considered are going to be purchased.
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>
>>> I suppose my real worry is that the address sale market dries up
>>> because it's more lucrative to lease them. With leasing agents running
>>> around helping address holders monetize their IP addresses through
>>> leasing in order to take a cut. That would be a travesty.
>> Would it? The easiest way to eliminate leasing providers outright is to
>> migrate to v6.
>>
>> The industry seems to prefer leasing providers over v6, so meh. Are all the
>> market
>> proponents going to claim the invisible hand is wrong now?
>>
>> Owen
>>
>>
> The invisible hand has its middle finger extended, telling you and those like
> you what many have been saying for years unto deaf ears. IPv6 and its
> migration have been and continue to be an utter disaster, created purely out
> of ivory tower hubris that designed it to be an incompatible dual stack dual
> cost useless investment for most of the actual users of the network.
>
> And it was easily predictable.
>
> Joe
Then the invisible hand ant its middle finger clearly prefer leasing, so why
all the hubbub about it?
Owen
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
