Aside from it making ULA+NTPv6 a smart move, perhaps even best practice for the majority of businesses to adopt rather than allow PA-ISP lock-in, no.
With the mentioned routing issue not being sustainable however, my proposal is likely DOA. Thank you. From: Owen DeLong <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 9:00 AM To: Larry R. Dockery <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Proposal - Remove Initial Small Assignment Requirements for IPv6 Is there a reason that you think the majority of small businesses that are not going to multi home should receive PI addresses rather than use PA? I’m neither in favor nor opposed at this time, but the answer to the above question is pivotal to whether this proposal serves an actual need or merely panders to the idea of PI for everybody, which until we change our routing technology to separate locators from identifiers isn’t sustainable. Owen On Sep 13, 2021, at 07:51 , Larry R. Dockery <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/proposals/2021/ARIN_prop_301_orig/ I would like to hear community feedback on this proposal. Thank you. _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
