Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
If people spent a tenth of the effort deploying IPv6 as they do fighting
over whether or not so and so should give up some IPv4 or whether or not
IPv4 should be leased or not leased, then nobody would be using IPv4
at all by now and the IPv4 debate would be a moot issue.
Ted
_______________________________________________
As before, I have deployed IPv6, well beyond the point of any demand or
use for it.
Ideas should not require litmus tests on their originators, they must be
able to stand on their own and that is how they should be considered.
Those not deploying IPv6 to your standards are not likely among the
audience here and your opinion on the matter is unlikely to accomplish
the results you wish for.
IPv6 was deployed in the expectation that the entire network would rush
to deploy it for the noblest of reasons and abandon practical
considerations.
That did not happen. Its not debatable. What is debatable is your
expectation that we can somehow still expect it to happen. I am of the
opinion it is unlikely to ever be fully deployed absent of practical
considerations being met. I suppose you believe it will, or you believe
that it will become ever more practical.
I am of the opinion that simply waiting for that is not the strategy the
internet needs now.
Joe
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
