A slight correction. I guess I didn't realize that you only need to be nominated by a member in good standing, not actually a member. Who knew? With that correction, I would still argue that the regulated should be self governed, antitrust and all.
Warm regards, -M< On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 9:26 PM Martin Hannigan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > It's probably more than process reform that is needed IMHO. I didn't > realize this changed, but you don't need to be a member in good standing to > run for the board. I'm pretty certain it used to be a requirement. Not sure > when that changed. It appears at least two of three possibly aren't. I'd > argue this is another black eye for the process. > > Warm regards, > > -M< > > > > On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 9:19 PM Scott Leibrand <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> In light of the public and private responses I’ve gotten to this >> question, it seems that the obvious explanations are considered far more >> credible than any innocent ones (of which none have been forthcoming this >> far). >> >> I would encourage everyone to support these petitions, to solicit >> candidates’ opinions on the matter of candidate selection, and then vote >> for candidates willing to publicly advocate for candidate selection reform >> at ARIN. Whether or not the process is currently undergoing capture, it >> certainly appears to lack the transparency needed to avoid it. >> >> Scott >> >> On Oct 9, 2021, at 5:37 PM, Owen DeLong <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> There were apparently at least 5 candidates. There are 2 open board >> seats. >> >> The nom-com approved only 3 candidates, hence my complaint. >> >> There are 7 open advisory council seats. I did not count the nomination >> list size, but I assure you it was well short of 14. >> >> Owen >> >> >> On Oct 9, 2021, at 17:30 , Steven Ryerse <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> If there are enough candidates there ought to be at least 2 for each seat >> and more than 2 is also good too. >> >> >> *Steven Ryerse* >> President >> >> *[email protected] <[email protected]>* | *C*: >> 770.656.1460 >> 100 Ashford Center North | Suite 110 | Atlanta, Georgia 30338 >> >> <image001.jpg> <https://www.facebook.com/EclipseNetworks/> >> <image002.jpg> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/eclipse-networks-inc/> >> <image003.jpg> <https://twitter.com/NetworksEclipse> <image004.jpg> >> <https://www.instagram.com/eclipsenetworks/> >> >> <image005.png> <https://www.eclipse-networks.com/> >> <image006.png><image007.png> >> >> *From:* ARIN-PPML <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Mike Burns >> *Sent:* Saturday, October 9, 2021 4:45 PM >> *To:* Scott Leibrand <[email protected]> >> *Cc:* arin-ppml <[email protected]> >> *Subject:* Re: [arin-ppml] Board Election Petition underway >> >> I was rejected for an Advisory Council candidacy even though I was a >> candidate in the past and am a policy author in multiple registries. >> Another broker was likewise rejected. >> There are 7 AC openings, only 10 candidates, but I was rejected. >> I know another broker who was, like me, solicited to run but then denied >> a candidacy. >> The NomCom is comprised of four insiders, two volunteers, and operates in >> the dark. >> Not saying this is the case, but very few likeminded individuals on the >> AC/Board can effectively capture these via NomCom filtering. >> A dangerous thing for Internet governance in the context of Afrinic. I >> don't want the governments of the world taking over from the amateurs. >> But if we continue to act amateurish... >> >> >> Regards, >> Mike >> >> >> >> ---- On Sat, 09 Oct 2021 11:58:00 -0400 *Scott Leibrand >> <[email protected] <[email protected]>>* wrote ---- >> >> >> Has ARIN disclosed anything about why the NomCom chose to exclude two >> obviously-qualified candidates from the ballot when they didn’t yet have 2 >> candidates per open seat, and the 3 candidates they did include are all >> less well-known to the community than both the ones they excluded? >> >> I can hypothesize some possible reasons, but none of them would reflect >> well on the NomCom, so I am reluctant to do so without learning their >> stated reason(s). >> >> Scott >> >> > On Oct 9, 2021, at 7:39 AM, Bill Woodcock <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > >> >> On Oct 9, 2021, at 4:03 PM, Martin Hannigan <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> There's a petition for two people to be added to the Trustee ballot >> after being rejected by the nom com. >> > >> > Yes! Go vote on the petitions, so you’ll have more than three choices >> to fill the two open board seats, when the election comes. Give yourself >> more options. >> > >> > -Bill >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > ARIN-PPML >> > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to >> > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). >> > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >> > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >> > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >> _______________________________________________ >> ARIN-PPML >> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to >> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). >> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >> >> >> >> >> >> *CAUTION:* This email originated from outside the organization. Do not >> click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know >> the content is safe. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ARIN-PPML >> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to >> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). >> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ARIN-PPML >> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to >> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). >> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >> >
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
